Author Topic: Corona Alpha4 Benchmark scene  (Read 305604 times)

2013-06-09, 13:52:49
Reply #135

Stan_Booth

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 525
    • View Profile
    • https://www.behance.net/archdizs
Keymaster, what is the cause can be that 4770k shows so long time in corona? It is may be some optimisation in code? 
It is interesting because in vray test 4770k = 3930k

2013-06-09, 14:44:13
Reply #136

Ondra

  • Administrator
  • Active Users
  • *****
  • Posts: 8889
  • Turning coffee to features since 2009
    • View Profile
I have no idea. I havent done any performance testing on these CPUs
Rendering is magic.
Private scene uploader | How to get minidumps for crashed/frozen 3ds Max | Sorry for short replies, brief responses = more time to develop Corona ;)

2013-06-09, 15:23:59
Reply #137

Tweekazoid

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 59
    • View Profile
    • personal CG and scripting stuff also few pictures
Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU X 980 @ 3.33GHz
Time: 0:4:0, Rays/s: 5,304,785



2013-06-09, 15:55:59
Reply #138

Ludvik Koutny

  • VIP
  • Active Users
  • ***
  • Posts: 2562
  • Just another user
    • View Profile
    • My Portfolio
Keymaster, what is the cause can be that 4770k shows so long time in corona? It is may be some optimisation in code? 
It is interesting because in vray test 4770k = 3930k

Afaik 3930k is a 6core (12thread machine) and Haswell architecture does not have that much performance boost over Ivy Bridge. It has significant power consumption difference though.

Non the less, I am quite confident 6core Ivy Bridge should perform better than 4core Haswell.

I wonder what Vray version you did tests on, as i remember that in one of older versions, there was some problem with multithreading efficiency. In 2.40.03 everything should run fine though.

2013-06-09, 21:14:51
Reply #139

Stan_Booth

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 525
    • View Profile
    • https://www.behance.net/archdizs
Keymaster, what is the cause can be that 4770k shows so long time in corona? It is may be some optimisation in code? 
It is interesting because in vray test 4770k = 3930k

Afaik 3930k is a 6core (12thread machine) and Haswell architecture does not have that much performance boost over Ivy Bridge. It has significant power consumption difference though.

Non the less, I am quite confident 6core Ivy Bridge should perform better than 4core Haswell.

I wonder what Vray version you did tests on, as i remember that in one of older versions, there was some problem with multithreading efficiency. In 2.40.03 everything should run fine though.

i understand this but:

http://www.hardware.fr/articles/897-15/protocole-cpu-rendu-3d-mental-ray-v-ray.html
http://www.ixbt.com/cpu/intel-ci7-4770k.shtml
http://3dcenter.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=108803&st=600&p=1479923&#entry1479923
http://3dcenter.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=108803&view=findpost&p=1479988

this tests makes me think about that is more interesting 4770k for 370$ than 3930k for 620$ (price in Ukraine) if they both are equal

and i think all are interesting in save 250$ for buy new videocard for example))
« Last Edit: 2013-06-09, 21:18:52 by headoff »

2013-06-09, 22:12:36
Reply #140

Ludvik Koutny

  • VIP
  • Active Users
  • ***
  • Posts: 2562
  • Just another user
    • View Profile
    • My Portfolio
It really depends on many conditions ;)

But i think here they tested different CPUs on same rig: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i7-4770k-haswell-review,3521-14.html

2013-06-09, 23:59:08
Reply #141

Ephaistophedes

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 3.20GHz
Time: 0:4:16, Rays/s: 4,965,634


2013-06-13, 17:05:29
Reply #142

Dmitry Lebedev

  • Users
  • *
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
whether there is at somebody this scene for.3ds?
есть ли у кого нибудь эта сцена для .3ds?

2013-06-16, 11:13:32
Reply #143

nangkri

  • Guest
Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 3.20GHz
Time: 0:4:7, Rays/s: 5,125,503


2013-06-16, 19:18:18
Reply #144

Juraj Talcik

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 3611
  • Tinkering away
    • View Profile
    • studio website
In simpler scenes, i4770 might come close to i3930, but in no way are they at equal perfomance in Vray :- ), wtf. I have both 3930k and 3770k (5perc. slower than 4770) and difference is exactly where it should be, close to 40perc.

Anyway, can anyone test it at current Xeon generation ? Is there any problem in perfomance scaling to dual cpus or xeon platform ? For example in 2x2867 E5 Xeons (16cores=32 threads).
talcikdemovicova.com  Website and blog
be.net/jurajtalcik   Our studio Behance portfolio
Instagram   Our studio Instagram, managed by Veronika

2013-06-17, 22:27:05
Reply #145

ibenk

  • Guest
Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3630QM CPU @ 2.40GHz
Time: 0:6:24, Rays/s: 3,304,037

2013-06-18, 01:46:53
Reply #146

CitizenPear

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
Living room 100 passes
AMD FX(tm)-8120 Eight-Core Processor
Time: 0:14:31, Rays/s: 1,461,297


Ufff... Seems like AMD Sucks!!!!

2013-06-19, 19:43:49
Reply #147

tonilluch

  • Users
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 4.2GHz
Time: 0:4:33, Rays/s: 4.654.375

« Last Edit: 2013-06-19, 19:46:35 by tonilluch »

2013-06-21, 05:41:27
Reply #148

ryancoy

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5660 @ 2.80GHz
Time: 0:3:17, Rays/s: 6,452,958

---i was expecting a slightly more faster speed for a 24 core cpu---


2013-06-21, 09:50:36
Reply #149

Juraj Talcik

  • Active Users
  • **
  • Posts: 3611
  • Tinkering away
    • View Profile
    • studio website
Corona Renderer Alpha 4 benchmark scene
 Living room 100 passes
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5660 @ 2.80GHz
Time: 0:3:17, Rays/s: 6,452,958

---i was expecting a slightly more faster speed for a 24 core cpu---

Don't loose hope, check this thread ;- ) http://corona-renderer.com/forum/index.php/topic,1038.msg8042.html#new
talcikdemovicova.com  Website and blog
be.net/jurajtalcik   Our studio Behance portfolio
Instagram   Our studio Instagram, managed by Veronika